USPTO serial 79000833
VIDAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VIDAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Watches and watch parts | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2014 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2014 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Dec 7, 2013 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 22, 2011 | PWFM | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - DISMISSED | — |
| Aug 5, 2011 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 11, 2011 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2011 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2006 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 14, 2006 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 13, 2006 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 16, 2005 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 1, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 7, 2004 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 26, 2004 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |