Drawing for TRANSMAT

USPTO serial 79000936

TRANSMAT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MANDIR, FREDERICK
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TRANSMAT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Bleaching preparations and other substances for laundry use; cleaning, polishing, scouring and abrasive preparations; soaps; perfumery, essential oils, cosmetics, hair lotions; dentifricesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 8, 2022DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Sep 7, 2022DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 7, 2022CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Jan 4, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 9, 2020INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jan 25, 2018ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jan 30, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 23, 2012RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jan 4, 2008CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
May 11, 2006FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 14, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 13, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 1, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 1, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 7, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 3, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 23, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 11, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 8, 2004SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance