Drawing for HARSPER

USPTO serial 79001054

HARSPER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2967256Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 12, 2005
Examiner
HAYASH, SUSAN C
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HARSPER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark J. Liss

MARK J LISS LEYDIG, VOIT & MAYER LTDTWO PRUDENTIAL PLZ STE 4900CHICAGO, IL 60601UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Video telephones, satellite television receivers, sound transmitters, frequency converters, monitors for computers; central processing units (processors), juke boxes for computers, pocket calculators, computer memories, television receivers, digital television receivers, plasma display panel, liquid crystal display, projection television, projection screenSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
035Import-export agencies, sales agency for LCD (liquid crystal display) monitors, sales arranging, namely, wholesale distributorship featuring LCD (liquid crystal display) monitors, commercial information agencies in the nature providing consumer product information via the Internet, product demonstration of goods, systemization of information into computer databases, namely database managementSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042Computer rental, rental of computer software, computer systems analysis, updating of computer software, consultancy in the field of computer hardware, design and drafting of LCD (liquid crystal display) monitorsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 4, 2014DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jul 4, 2014DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 18, 2014INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Oct 9, 2013INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Nov 23, 2012INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Mar 23, 2012C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Sep 6, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 15, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 13, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 21, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 12, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 19, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 30, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 24, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 21, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 18, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 14, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 13, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 4, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 4, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 27, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 27, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 23, 2004ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 23, 2004REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 22, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 9, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 8, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 29, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 17, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 12, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance