USPTO serial 79001075
FLIGHT GOURMET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GEORGE, DAHLIA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FLIGHT GOURMET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J. Jeffrey Coons
J JEFFREY COONS PIETRANGELO COOK PLC6410 POPLAR AVE STE 190MEMPHIS, TN 38119UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | Distribution and delivery of meals for airline catering requirements | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 043 | Catering, restaurant and self-service restaurant services, canteen and cafeterias services, providing of food and drink in restaurants in airports and airlines; food and drink preparation for consumption in airports and for airlines | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2014 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2014 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2014 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Dec 10, 2010 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2010 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2006 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 5, 2006 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 4, 2006 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 24, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 23, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 9, 2004 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 9, 2004 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 12, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |