Drawing for BLACK PEPPER

USPTO serial 79001126

BLACK PEPPER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3129963Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 15, 2006
Examiner
CHARLON, BARNEY
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BLACK PEPPER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018[ Leather and imitation leather sold in bulk; goods of leather or imitation leather, namely, sports bags, ] rucksacks, [ beach bags, handbags, satchels, attaché cases, document holders, briefcases, luggage articles, storage bags, hunting bags, knapsacks, game bags, ] schoolbags, [ pocket wallets, money purses, roller bags, suitcases, travelling bags, key cases, collars for dogs and cats, leashes; animal skins, hides; trunks and suitcases; umbrellas; parasols and walking sticks; whips and saddlery ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED
025Articles of clothing, namely, shirts, [ blouses, ] T-shirts, [ pants, shorts, sweaters, sweatshirts, jackets, coats, pullovers, scarves, suits, pajamas, nightgowns, robes, nightshirts, ties, hats, caps, peaked caps, ski caps, sports caps, sun visors and shoes, footwear, headwear, gloves, belts ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 31, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jul 27, 2018FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 9, 2018GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 26, 2018INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Dec 19, 2017INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Dec 19, 2017INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Dec 7, 2017INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Jun 16, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 15, 2017RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
May 23, 2017CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED
Apr 7, 2017C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Jan 31, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 15, 2015REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Aug 14, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Mar 6, 2015INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Jun 11, 2014INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Nov 19, 2013INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Mar 19, 2013NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Mar 19, 201371AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Mar 19, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Feb 15, 2013ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Apr 18, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
May 17, 2007RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Apr 10, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Apr 10, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Apr 10, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Aug 15, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 23, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 3, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Apr 3, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Mar 31, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 26, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 6, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 2, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 2, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 9, 2005OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 6, 2005GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 6, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 18, 2005OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Aug 18, 2005OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Aug 12, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Jun 6, 2005PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Jun 6, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED
May 9, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Apr 7, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Apr 6, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 6, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 6, 2005NAUDREPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED
Mar 8, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Mar 8, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Oct 7, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 8, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 9, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 17, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Mar 12, 2004SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance