Drawing for KRÄMER

USPTO serial 79001169

KRÄMER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
RUPP, TERRY
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KRÄMER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007FILLING MACHINES, NAMELY, MACHINES FOR FILLING BOXES, CONTAINERS, RECEPTACLES WITH SMALL ARTICLES, SUCH AS TABLETS AND THE LIKE; AIR CUSHION MACHINES FOR MOVING LOADS, NAMELY, AIR CUSHION MACHINES FOR PRODUCING AIR CUSHIONS ON RAILS, CHANNELS AND PLATES FOR THE TRANSPORT AND MOVEMENT OF LOADS THEREON FOR USE IN THE PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY; AND, VIBRATOR MACHINES FOR INDUSTRIAL USE FOR TRANSPORTING SMALL ITEMSSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 27, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jan 23, 2014RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Jul 6, 2006FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 9, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jun 9, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Nov 9, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 9, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 2, 2005OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 18, 2005OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Aug 18, 2005OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Apr 8, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 7, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 24, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Mar 11, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 11, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 7, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 8, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 29, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 29, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Mar 22, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance