USPTO serial 79001218
MST.FACTORY DORTMUND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3007552Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 18, 2005
- Examiner
- AYALA, LOURDES
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MST.FACTORY DORTMUND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
DE
DE
DE
DE
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business and business organizational consultation of start-up companies from the range of microsystems technology; marketing and market studies; Organization and holding of fairs for commercial or advertising purposes; organizing exhibitions for commercial or advertising purposes in the field of microsystems technology | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 040 | Material treatment services in the nature of structuring of micro of micro technical components from metal, plastics, silicon and other materials | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | Basic and vocational training in the area of microsystems technology; Organization and conduction of training courses and advanced training seminars concerning the use and application of microsystems technology; Organization and conduction of conferences, seminars and congresses for enterprises and other organizations concerning the use and application of microsystems technology | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Scientific and technological research and development services in the area of microsystems technology for enterprises and other organizations; technology transfer services, namely, licensing and transfer of intellectual property in the field of microsystems technology; conducting technical and scientific studies and surveys in the field of microsystems technology; technical and technology-oriented consultation in the field of microsystems technology and microstructuring geared towards companies with focus on start-up companies | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MST.factory dortmund GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by MST.factory dortmund GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by MST.factory dortmund GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by MST .factory dortmund GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named MST.FACTORY DORTMUND
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 2014 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 2013 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2013 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 28, 2013 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 29, 2012 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 12, 2006 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 12, 2006 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 19, 2006 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2005 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 26, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 6, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 21, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 11, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 10, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 4, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 31, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 15, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2004 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 23, 2004 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |