Drawing for ELLIPSE

USPTO serial 79001226

ELLIPSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SWAIN, MICHELE LYNN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ELLIPSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOHN M. KEENE

JOHN M KEENE GRAHAM, CAMPAIGN PC36 W 44TH STSTE 1300NEW YORK, NY 10036

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Brandy and CognacSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 10, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Dec 9, 2022ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Apr 1, 2022ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Feb 17, 2014RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Aug 19, 2011NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 6, 2006FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 9, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 9, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 28, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 28, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 16, 2005OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 12, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 25, 2005OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 25, 2005OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 30, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 30, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 28, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 14, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 14, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 7, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 8, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 16, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 29, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 25, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance