Drawing for PMDVISION

USPTO serial 79001239

PMDVISION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3283159Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 21, 2007
Examiner
SOUDERS, MICHAEL J
Law office
—

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PMDVISION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Alex R. Sluzas

Alex R. Sluzas PAUL & PAULTWO THOUSAND MARKET STSuite 2900PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009[ Aerials;] optical, infrared [ and ultrasonic ] inspection apparatus for industrial use; [ binoculars; telescopes; radar detectors; radar guns for police work; radar guns for sporting events; radar receivers with amplifiers; scanners for automatic surface control; ] laser measuring systems consisting primarily of a laser and a detector; electronic semiconductor devices; integrated circuits; [ range finders; ] sensors for determination of positions and distances; telemeters for vehicles, [ weapons, aeroplanes, industrial use and LCD game machines; instruments for measuring length; ] remote controls for radios, televisions, stereos, computers, industrial machines, vehicles, [ weapons and airplanes; ] remote cursor controls for computers; [ remote control for telemetering machines and apparatus; electronic and optical communications instruments and components, namely, optical transmitters and optical receivers; electronic testing equipment, namely, sound level meters; ultrasonic sensors; ] digital cameras, video cameras and infrared cameras; motion picture cameras; surveying instruments, namely, surveying chains and surveying levels; [ measuring apparatus, namely, bevels; satellites for scientific purposes; frequency meters; printed circuit boards; amperometers for electrical signals; video cassette recorders; video tape recorders; ] electric and electronic [ video ] surveillance installations [ ; virtual reality game software ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
028[ Board games; card games; plush toys, mechanical toys, plastic character toys; gymnastic apparatus; sports balls; scale model airplanes; spinning tops; toy pistols; tennis and squash rackets; LCD game machines; electronic dart games; hand held unit for playing video and electronic games; coin-operated video games; clay pigeon traps ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042Scientific research; technical consultation and research in the field of aerospace engineering, electrical and optical engineering, [ communication design; design and testing of new products for others; industrial design; ] computer hardware and computer software developmentSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 10, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 11, 2019INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Dec 5, 2018INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Dec 5, 2018INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Nov 23, 2018INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Mar 23, 2018C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Nov 3, 2016ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Apr 23, 2015INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Aug 15, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 2, 2014INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
May 5, 2014INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Mar 26, 2014LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Feb 17, 2014LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Nov 29, 2013RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Sep 5, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED—
Sep 5, 2013C75PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Sep 3, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 15, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Aug 15, 2013ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2009FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 10, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 10, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 28, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 21, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 5, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 16, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 4, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 2, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 31, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 31, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 24, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 23, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 27, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 26, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 22, 2006RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Oct 31, 2005CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Sep 16, 2005OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 25, 2005OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 25, 2005OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 27, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 27, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 13, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 5, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 1, 2005PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Feb 1, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 30, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 30, 2004NAUDREPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED—
Dec 30, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 13, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 13, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 13, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 9, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 8, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 29, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 25, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance