Drawing for Serial No. 79001248

USPTO serial 79001248

Serial No. 79001248

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3046234Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 17, 2006
Examiner
FROMM, MARTHA L
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 79001248?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bruce S. Londa

INVICTA SRLLEINI (TO),ITALY

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018Bags, namely, sports bags, athletic bags, school bags; trunks and travelling bags, handbags, backpacks, waistpacks, suitcases; sacks, namely, leather pouches; rucksacks, knapsacksSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
025Clothing, namely jackets, insulated jackets, down jackets, rain jackets, fleece jackets, wind jackets, vests, insulated vests, down vests, fleece vests, wind vests, pants, short pants, jersey, shirts, T-shirts, gloves, mitten, head bands; headgear, namely caps; footwear, namely sports shoes, boots, sneakersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 22, 2014DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jul 22, 2014DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 17, 2014INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Mar 21, 2014INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 24, 2013INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Aug 24, 2012C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Sep 28, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 22, 2007CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 22, 2007CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 28, 2006CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Nov 16, 2006CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Sep 1, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 1, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 10, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 17, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 25, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 5, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 16, 2005OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 25, 2005OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 25, 2005OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 22, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 1, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 27, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 27, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 14, 2005REINREINSTATED—
Apr 25, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 25, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Apr 7, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Mar 1, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 1, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 16, 2004RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 30, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 21, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 29, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 25, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance