USPTO serial 79001281
NOVAGARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WOOD, CAROLINE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NOVAGARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemical products for use in the food industry; chemical substances for preserving foodstuffs; antimicrobial substances for use in the food industry | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 16, 2024 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 5, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Mar 10, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2014 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 11, 2012 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2006 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 4, 2006 | DCPN | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 26, 2006 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 6, 2006 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 16, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 1, 2004 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 31, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 2004 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 13, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 8, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |