Drawing for JUSEN

USPTO serial 79001301

JUSEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SOMERVILLE, ARETHA CHARESE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with JUSEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Shrimps, prawns and lobsters (not live); edible aquatic animals (not live, fresh, chilled or frozen); edible oils and fats; milk products; meat for human consumption (fresh, chilled or frozen); eggs; frozen vegetables; frozen fruits; processed meat products; processed fisheries products; processed vegetables and fruits; fried tofu pieces; freeze-dried tofu pieces; jelly made from devils' tongue root; soybean milk; tofu; fermented soybeans; processed eggs; curry soup preparations, stew and soup mixes; dried flakes of laver for sprinkling on rice in hot water (Ochazukenori); fermented soybean food as accompaniment (Name-mono); beans, preserved; protein for human consumptionSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 30, 2014DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Aug 29, 2014DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
May 11, 2006FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 18, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Apr 17, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 20, 2006LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB
Apr 11, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 11, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 14, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 10, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 6, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 22, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 13, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Apr 8, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance