Drawing for ROTACHROM

USPTO serial 79001332

ROTACHROM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3085575Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 25, 2006
Examiner
COGGINS, ROBERT H
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ROTACHROM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001REAGENTS FOR SCIENTIFIC, HUMAN MEDICINE RESEARCH, OR VETERINARY MEDICINE RESEARCH USE, NAMELY, REAGENTS USED IN MEDICAL APPARATUS FOR CHEMICAL OR BIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS FOR USE IN RESEARCH LABORATORY ANALYSIS, REACTIONS, ASSAYS, OR TESTSSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 15, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Oct 15, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jul 10, 2015ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Jan 30, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jun 6, 2012NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED
Jun 6, 2012C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Jun 6, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Feb 17, 2012715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED
Feb 17, 2012ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
Nov 25, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 1, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Dec 1, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Nov 3, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Apr 25, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 30, 2006RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Jan 31, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 11, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Dec 16, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Dec 9, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 8, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 7, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Dec 7, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 7, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 6, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 6, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Dec 6, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 6, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Dec 6, 2005PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Nov 3, 2005CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Oct 17, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 17, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 3, 2005CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB
Sep 30, 2005OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 1, 2005OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Sep 1, 2005OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jul 1, 2005CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED
May 20, 2005CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB
Apr 29, 2005CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Mar 21, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 19, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 22, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jan 31, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 31, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 7, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 3, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 4, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 13, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Apr 8, 2004SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance