USPTO serial 79001383
MONT BLANC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3021081Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 29, 2005
- Examiner
- FRENCH, CURTIS W
- Law office
- —
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MONT BLANC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NL
NL
NL
DE
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | [ Business consulting, business management assistance; data and information services, namely, providing business information and management services for businesses involved in the area of computer servers, data transmission networks and telecommunications networks; organization and running of trade exhibitions, in the field of arts education, literacy, musicianship, charitable activities, artisanship, fashion; advertising services, namely, promoting the goods and services of others by arranging for sponsors to affiliate their goods and services with organized cultural, educational, charitable and business events and exhibitions; dissemination of advertising and advertising material ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | EDUCATION AND TRAINING SERVICES, NAMELY,ARRANGING AND CONDUCTING CONFERENCES, AWARD PROGRAMS, SEMINARS, COLLOQUIUMS, EXHIBITIONS AND LECTURES IN THE FIELD OF ARTS EDUCATION, LITERACY, MUSICIANSHIPS, CHARITABLE ACTIVITIES, ARTISANSHIP, [ PEACE, FASHION, AND ARTISTIC ACCOMPLISHMENT; ] ARRANGING AND CONDUCTING PROGRAMS AND EXHIBITIONS FOR EDUCATIONAL AND ENTERTAINMENT PURPOSES FEATURING ARTISTS AND THEIR WORKS; PROVIDING RECOGNITION AND INCENTIVES BY THE WAY OF AWARDS TO DEMONSTRATE EXCELLENCE IN THE FIELDS OF LITERACY ARTS EDUCATION AND ARTISTIC ACCOMPLISHMENTS; ARRANGING AND CONDUCTING COMPETITIVE [ AND NON-COMPETITIVE ] SPORTING AND CULTURAL EVENTS | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Montblanc International B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Montblanc International B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Montblanc International B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by MONTBLANC-SIMPLO GMBH
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named MONT BLANC
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 2024 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 6, 2017 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jul 6, 2017 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jun 2, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 18, 2017 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 18, 2017 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 1, 2017 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 1, 2016 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jan 7, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 7, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2014 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Mar 18, 2014 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 17, 2014 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 23, 2013 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 24, 2012 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2012 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 23, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 29, 2012 | 71AF | REGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED | — |
| May 29, 2012 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2011 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 24, 2007 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 8, 2006 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 8, 2006 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 16, 2006 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 13, 2006 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 6, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 17, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 17, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 22, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 21, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 14, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 13, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 8, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 30, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 14, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 7, 2004 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 13, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |