Drawing for Serial No. 79001401

USPTO serial 79001401

Serial No. 79001401

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KEAM, ALEX S
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 79001401?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jospeh F. Nicholson

JOSEPH NICHOLSON KENYON & KENYONONE BORADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES, NAMELY, VODKASECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 25, 2014DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jul 24, 2014DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 6, 2006FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 9, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 9, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 17, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 17, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 30, 2005OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 8, 2005OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 8, 2005OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 19, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 18, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 22, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 27, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 27, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 12, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 30, 2004UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Sep 16, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 13, 2004NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 21, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 20, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 13, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Apr 9, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance