USPTO serial 79001498
REGIOLUX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2992658Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 6, 2005
- Examiner
- ANKRAH, NAAKWAMA S
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with REGIOLUX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Lamps, namely functional lamps, interior lighting lamps, exterior lighting lamps, lamps for furnishing, luxury lamps | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2026 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jan 15, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2024 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2018 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Oct 20, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 3, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 12, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2014 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2014 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 4, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 19, 2014 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2011 | NA15 | SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2011 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2011 | 15AK | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED | — |
| Aug 25, 2011 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 24, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 23, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 16, 2011 | E15R | TEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2011 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 10, 2006 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 7, 2006 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 16, 2006 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 14, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 25, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 21, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 7, 2004 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 13, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2004 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |