Drawing for NOAH

USPTO serial 79001535

NOAH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NOAH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032Spring waterSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 19, 2014DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Sep 18, 2014DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 29, 2011CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jul 6, 2006FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 9, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 9, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 15, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 15, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 7, 2005OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 15, 2005OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 15, 2005OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 19, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 19, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 24, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 24, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 4, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 6, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 4, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 21, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 27, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Apr 21, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance