Drawing for ABUS

USPTO serial 79001563

ABUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3011547Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 1, 2005
Examiner
RADEMACHER, APRIL LUEDERS
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with ABUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Max Vern

Max Vern Amster, Rothstein & Ebenstein LLP405 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10174United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006[ BASE METALS AND ALLOYS THEREOF FOR USE IN FURTHER MANUFACTURING, CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS MADE OF METAL, NAMELY, BEAMS, POSTS, STRUTS, PLATES, PANELS, TRUSSES, GIRDERS, BARS, ANGLES, RODS, REINFORCING BARS, MESH AND SCREENING; FITTERS AND SMALL IRON WARE, NAMELY, FRAMES, NAMELY, METAL DOOR FRAMES, METAL WINDOW FRAMES, METAL SCREEN FRAMES; ] HINGES, EYELETS, NAMELY, LOCK EYELETS, BOLT EYELETS, HOOK EYELETS; [ RINGS, NAMELY, CHAIN RINGS, CATCH RINGS; PINS, NAMELY, HINGE PINS AND LOCK PINS AND SHELF SUPPORTS; ] HARDWARE MADE OF METAL, NAMELY, LOCKS, PADLOCKS, BOX LOCKS, BOLT LOCKS, LOCK CYLINDERS, HASPS, DOOR CHAINS, [ DOOR AND WINDOW BOLTS, DOOR AND WINDOW HANDLES, BARS FOR ROLLER SHUTTERS AND AIR SHAFTS, ] KEYS AND KEY BLANKS, [ SHELF BRACKETS, ] CABLE LOCKS; [ METAL MECHANICAL AND NON-ELECTRIC DOOR CLOSERS; ] METAL DOOR AND WINDOW FITTINGS, NAMELY, DOOR LOCKS, DOOR HANDLES, WINDOW LOCKS [ , WINDOW HANDLES, DOOR FRAMES, WINDOW FRAMES ]ACTIVE—
012COVERS FOR BICYCLES OR MOTORCYCLE SADDLES, [ TWO-WHEEL BRAKES FOR LAND] VEHICLES, MECHANICAL ANTI-THEFT DEVICES FOR VEHICLES, ANTI-THEFT ALARMS FOR VEHICLES, [ DIRECTION INDICATORS FOR BICYCLES, BICYCLE BELLS, BICYCLE CHAINS ] ; BICYCLE ACOUSTIC WARNING DEVICES, NAMELY, [ HORNS, ] SIRENS [ ; BICYCLE BASKETS, BICYCLE HANDLE BARS, BICYCLE NETS, BICYCLE PEDALS, BICYCLE PUMPS, BICYCLE SADDLES, RACKS FOR VEHICLES FOR BICYCLES, SKIS, LUGGAGE ]ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 27, 2026INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 27, 2026NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Feb 27, 202671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Feb 23, 2026APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 28, 2025ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Nov 1, 2024REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Nov 30, 2023RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Mar 3, 2023TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 3, 2023ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS—
Mar 3, 2023ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 3, 2023REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 13, 2020ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Mar 29, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 15, 2016INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE—
Jun 14, 2016INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Oct 14, 2015NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Oct 14, 201571AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Oct 14, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 3, 2015ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Nov 21, 2013RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Oct 12, 2013INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Aug 21, 2013INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Aug 22, 2012INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Nov 22, 2011NA15SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - E-MAILED—
Nov 22, 2011NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Nov 22, 201171AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Nov 22, 201115AKREGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED—
Nov 2, 2011APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 1, 2011APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 17, 2011E15RTEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED—
Oct 17, 2011ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Feb 20, 2009NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 31, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 14, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 14, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 19, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 1, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 9, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 20, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 25, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 13, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 4, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 18, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 25, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 25, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 2, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 1, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 3, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 26, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 26, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 29, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 26, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 21, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 27, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Apr 21, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance