USPTO serial 79001774
CARETTA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JACKSON, STEVEN W
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CARETTA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines and machine tools; motors and engines (except for land vehicles); machine coupling and transmission components (except for land vehicles); agricultural implements other than hand-operated; incubators for eggs | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 012 | Vehicles; apparatus for locomotion by land, air or water | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2014 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2014 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 10, 2006 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 13, 2006 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 12, 2006 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 8, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 26, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 22, 2004 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 28, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |