Drawing for ACTIONBROWSER

USPTO serial 79001840

ACTIONBROWSER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
WATSON, JULIE A
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ACTIONBROWSER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Telecommunication machines and apparatus, namely, cellular phones with web browsing capability; electronic machines, apparatus and their parts, namely, cellular phones with web browsing capability; computers, and parts therefore, namely, central processing units, programmed-data-encoded electronic circuits, blank magnetic disks and blank magnetic tapes for computers and computer peripheral equipment.SECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 11, 2014DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Oct 10, 2014DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Aug 31, 2007FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 24, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jul 24, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jul 17, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 17, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 19, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 19, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 28, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Nov 14, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 14, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 13, 2005OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 29, 2005OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Sep 29, 2005OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Sep 8, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 7, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 30, 2005UNDCUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED
Jun 9, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
May 5, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 28, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 28, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 7, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 25, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 25, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 29, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 30, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 3, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Apr 29, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance