USPTO serial 79001918
FLORIDILE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3004559Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 4, 2005
- Examiner
- DWYER, SEAN
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FLORIDILE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CH-1214 Vernier, CH
CH-1214 Vernier, CH
CH-1214 Vernier, CH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kathryn E. Smith
Kathryn E. Smith Wood Herron & Evans LLP441 Vine Street2700 Carew TowerCINCINNATI, OH 45202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemicals used for preparing perfumery and cosmetics compositions | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 9, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2026 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Oct 4, 2024 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2024 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Nov 25, 2015 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2015 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 19, 2015 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2014 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jun 16, 2012 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2012 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 14, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 29, 2012 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 11, 2006 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 11, 2006 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 12, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 22, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 31, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 23, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 18, 2004 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 14, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |