USPTO serial 79001986
GOLDEN BOY BRAND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUTLER, MIDGE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GOLDEN BOY BRAND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Preparations made wholly or principally of bean curd; dried bean curd; beans being dried; soya beans preserved for food; prepared vegetables; dried vegetables; preserved food products of vegetables; tinned canned vegetables; prepared nuts; processed peanuts; edible nuts; chick peas; processed peas; sausages; preserved fruits; tinned canned fruits; dried fruits; anchovy; dried chili; oysters (not live); prawns (not live); shellfish (not live); shrimps (not live); preserved fish; fish products for food; salted fish; dried fish; canned fish; potatoes being dried; dried tangerines; edible seeds; dried mushrooms; prepared mushrooms; mollusca; pork products; dates; prunes; dried preparations for use in making soups; canned soups; prepared almonds; dried apricots; prepared figs; garlic toppings for cooking; preserved garlic; jellies for food; sliced cuttle-fish; dried cuttle-fish; desserts of nut, fruit and/or jelly origin; canned foodstuffs of animal and/or plant origin; prepared chestnuts; sesame seeds; canned foodstuffs of vegetable origin | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 2014 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 11, 2006 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 24, 2006 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 13, 2005 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 16, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 16, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 12, 2004 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 14, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2004 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |