Drawing for HUAFU

USPTO serial 79002017

HUAFU

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3112143Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 4, 2006
Examiner
WISEMAN, MICHELLE
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HUAFU?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Glass bottles and small glass bottles (containers), glass stoppers, glass cups, colored beverage glassware, glassware, namely, cups, plates, kettles, cooking pots, and glass jugs; table place card holders made of glass or chinaware, plates made of glass or chinawareSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 29, 2014DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Aug 29, 2014DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jul 22, 2014INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Jun 6, 2014INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Nov 1, 2013INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Mar 1, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Mar 7, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 9, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Mar 9, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Mar 6, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jul 4, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 11, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 22, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Feb 21, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Feb 17, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Feb 13, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 10, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Feb 9, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jan 27, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 27, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 17, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 17, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Oct 28, 2005OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 13, 2005OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Oct 13, 2005OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Aug 8, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 7, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 14, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jul 8, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 8, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 30, 2005CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
May 27, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 26, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 26, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 26, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 3, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Mar 30, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 30, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 14, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 21, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 2, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 17, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
May 12, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance