Drawing for HARMATTAN

USPTO serial 79002031

HARMATTAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3008999Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 25, 2005
Examiner
AYALA, LOURDES
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HARMATTAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Dianne Smith-Misemer

Dianne Smith-Misemer Hovey Williams LLP10801 Mastin Blvd., Suite 1000Overland Park, KS 66210UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019Non-metal building materials, namely, composite or synthesis materials, reinforced or not with fibers for roofing, building structure, siding and covering walls, siding, cladding and wall coverings made of terra-cotta, concrete, cement, asphalt, namely, wallboard, non-metal curtain-wall, non-metal plastic wallboard, tiles of clay, glass, gypsum, ceramic or stoneware for walls, wall panels not of metal, wall tiles; bricks and non-metallic tiles for building useSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 6, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Aug 22, 2014DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Aug 22, 2014DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 7, 2014INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Mar 6, 2014ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Nov 8, 2013INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Mar 8, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Aug 6, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 6, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 31, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 14, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 14, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 19, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 10, 2005OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 25, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 21, 2005OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 21, 2005OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 2, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 13, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 16, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 25, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 20, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 19, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 9, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 9, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 7, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 9, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 14, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
May 13, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance