Drawing for MINITANK

USPTO serial 79002118

MINITANK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MINITANK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028GAMES AND TOYS, NAMELY, MODEL TRAINS, PARTICULARLY ENGINES, RAILWAY CARRIAGES AND TRAMS, RAIL MATERIALS FOR MODEL VEHICLES, PARTICULARLY, MODEL TRAINS AND MODEL CARS, MODELS OF ARMY VEHICLES, PARTICULARLY ARMORED VEHICLES, HEAVY GOODS VEHICLES, SHIPS AND AIRCRAFT, TOY RAILWAYS, RAIL SYSTEMS FOR ELECTRICALLY DRIVEN MODEL VEHICLES, PARTICULARLY MOTOR VEHICLES, STEAM GENERATORS FOR MODEL MODELS OF RAIL AND ROAD VEHICLES, MODEL BUILDINGS, MODELS OF LIGHTING AND SIGNALLING EQUIPMENTSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 23, 2014DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Jul 22, 2014DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Dec 14, 2006CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Jun 15, 2006FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
May 26, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
May 25, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Sep 30, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 30, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 4, 2005CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
Mar 3, 2005CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED
Mar 3, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Feb 28, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 25, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 11, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Feb 10, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 10, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 25, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 25, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 9, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 22, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 21, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 17, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
May 13, 2004SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance