Drawing for SATORI STOCKTEC

USPTO serial 79002171

SATORI STOCKTEC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3035900Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 27, 2005
Examiner
FINK, GINA M
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SATORI STOCKTEC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CARL OPPEDAHL

Carl Oppedahl Oppedahl Patent Law Firm LLCP O Box 5940Dillon, CO 80435-5940UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001chemical products for the fresh-keeping and preserving of foodSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
011autoclaves, steam generators, refrigerating machinesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
040food processing, namely preservation and treatment of foodstuffs by way of heating, cooking, generating steam, pressurizing, refrigerating and dryingSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 11, 2014DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Sep 11, 2014DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 29, 2014INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jun 23, 2014INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Dec 19, 2013INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Apr 19, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jun 19, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 28, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 16, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 16, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 3, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 21, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jan 24, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 27, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 11, 2005OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 21, 2005OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 21, 2005OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 4, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 14, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 16, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 10, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 9, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 9, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 31, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 31, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 19, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 18, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 15, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 15, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 10, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 10, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 14, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 14, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 10, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 8, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 20, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
May 20, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance