USPTO serial 79002344
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Dental instruments, namely electric micromotors, air-driven micromotors and their parts, ball bearing turbines and air bearing turbines and straight turbines with pneumatic units, electric controls for electric micromotors for dental use, hand pieces and contra-angles for air-driven micro dental engines | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2026 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2026 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 15, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 2, 2026 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2025 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2024 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Aug 18, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2016 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2016 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 28, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 30, 2015 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2015 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2014 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jun 7, 2012 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2012 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 24, 2012 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 6, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 29, 2005 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 16, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 27, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 23, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 19, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2005 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| May 17, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 6, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 28, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 7, 2004 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 2004 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 3, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 3, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |