Drawing for BA

USPTO serial 79002344

BA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3063805Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 28, 2006
Examiner
THOMAS, AMY E
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with BA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Dental instruments, namely electric micromotors, air-driven micromotors and their parts, ball bearing turbines and air bearing turbines and straight turbines with pneumatic units, electric controls for electric micromotors for dental use, hand pieces and contra-angles for air-driven micro dental enginesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 23, 2026NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Jun 23, 202671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Jun 15, 2026APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Mar 2, 2026ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Feb 28, 2025REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Jan 25, 2024RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Aug 18, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jan 28, 2016NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Jan 28, 201671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Jan 28, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Dec 30, 2015ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Feb 28, 2015REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Feb 6, 2014RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Jun 7, 2012NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Jun 7, 201271AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Jun 6, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Feb 24, 2012ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Oct 19, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 3, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Oct 3, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Sep 25, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 28, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 6, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 29, 2005OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 16, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Nov 3, 2005OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Nov 3, 2005OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 17, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
May 27, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 23, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 19, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
May 18, 2005REINREINSTATED
May 17, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Apr 6, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 6, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 28, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 28, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 7, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 8, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 5, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 25, 2004CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Jun 3, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Jun 3, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance