Drawing for BA

USPTO serial 79002344

BA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3063805Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 28, 2006
Examiner
THOMAS, AMY E
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with BA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven J. Solomon

Steven J. Solomon Tucker Ellis LLP950 Main Avenue, Suite 1100Cleveland, OH 44113United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Dental instruments, namely electric micromotors, air-driven micromotors and their parts, ball bearing turbines and air bearing turbines and straight turbines with pneumatic units, electric controls for electric micromotors for dental use, hand pieces and contra-angles for air-driven micro dental enginesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 23, 2026NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jun 23, 202671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jun 15, 2026APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 2, 2026ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Feb 28, 2025REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jan 25, 2024RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Aug 18, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 28, 2016NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jan 28, 201671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jan 28, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 30, 2015ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Feb 28, 2015REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Feb 6, 2014RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jun 7, 2012NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jun 7, 201271AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jun 6, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Feb 24, 2012ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Oct 19, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 3, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 3, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 25, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 28, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 6, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 29, 2005OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 16, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 3, 2005OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 3, 2005OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 17, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 27, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 23, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 19, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 18, 2005REINREINSTATED—
May 17, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Apr 6, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 6, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 28, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 28, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 7, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 8, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 5, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 25, 2004CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 3, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 3, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance