Drawing for BIG SHOT

USPTO serial 79002485

BIG SHOT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAPPENFIELD, ANN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BIG SHOT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Peter J. Toren

PETER J TOREN SIDLEY AUSTIN BROWN & WOOD LLP787 7TH AVENEW YORK, NY 10019UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Herbal liqueurs, distilled spiritsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 8, 2014DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Nov 7, 2014DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 24, 2011ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Aug 31, 2006FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 10, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 10, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 6, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 4, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 10, 2005OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 7, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 6, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 2, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 23, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 23, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 13, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 30, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 23, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 8, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 10, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 10, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance