Drawing for HAPI

USPTO serial 79002525

HAPI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2967276Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 12, 2005
Examiner
SONNEBORN, TRICIA L
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HAPI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christine M. Baker

Christine M. Baker Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky & Popeo, PC666 Third Avenue24th FloorNew York, NY 10017

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032BeerSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 17, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 13, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 29, 2019ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Apr 7, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jan 17, 2017XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Jan 17, 2017XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Oct 19, 2016INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 19, 2016C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Dec 12, 2013RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Aug 23, 2013ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Aug 17, 2011NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED—
Aug 17, 201171AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Aug 10, 2011APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 19, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 19, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 8, 2011ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Oct 11, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 11, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 27, 2006FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 5, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 5, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 21, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 12, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 19, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 30, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 18, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 14, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 7, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 6, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 21, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 21, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 2, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 30, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 17, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 10, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 10, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance