Drawing for PIAVE

USPTO serial 79002603

PIAVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3148830Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 26, 2006
Examiner
BALDWIN, SCOTT
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with PIAVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*

Plus Government fees of $850

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Keith A. Weltsch

Keith A. Weltsch Scully, Scott, Murphy & Presser, P.C.400 Garden City PlazaSuite 300Garden City, NY 11530

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029CheeseACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 21, 2026NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Oct 21, 202671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Oct 19, 2026APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 25, 2026ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Sep 26, 2025REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Apr 16, 2020RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Oct 5, 2016NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Oct 5, 201671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Oct 5, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 1, 2016ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Sep 26, 2015REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Sep 28, 2012NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Sep 28, 2012C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Sep 28, 2012715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Sep 28, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 10, 2012ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Apr 15, 2010RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Apr 8, 2010NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 17, 2007FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 1, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 1, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 26, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 26, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 4, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 14, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 19, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 17, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 25, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 2, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 9, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 9, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 10, 2005OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 5, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 2, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 18, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 17, 2005CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 15, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 15, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 7, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 10, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 18, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 10, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 10, 2004SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance