USPTO serial 79002640
DIB- DIF DO IT BETTER - DO IT FASTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3098294Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 30, 2006
- Examiner
- DWYER, SEAN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DIB- DIF DO IT BETTER - DO IT FASTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for application and database integration; Computer software for the collection, editing, organizing, modifying, book marking, transmission, storage and sharing of data and information | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Business management consultation; Information and data compiling and analyzing relating to business management | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | Computer education training services | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Web site design, design of computer software and computer networks all for others | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Dominique GUILLET
- Other trademarks owned by Dominique GUILLET
- Other trademarks owned by Dominique GUILLET
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named DIB- DIF DO IT BETTER - DO IT FASTER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7, 2014 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Oct 16, 2014 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2014 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 12, 2014 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 30, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 30, 2013 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 24, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 30, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 7, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 15, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 16, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 16, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 23, 2005 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Dec 9, 2005 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 25, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 23, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 17, 2005 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2005 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 20, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 20, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 15, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 30, 2005 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 7, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 5, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 4, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 4, 2004 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 6, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 18, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |