USPTO serial 79002672
UM DANDIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3127018Status 706Renewal
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 8, 2006
- Examiner
- FROMM, MARTHA L
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with UM DANDIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | POWER OPERATED MACHINES, NAMELY, GRINDING MACHINES, POWER SAW BLADES, MACHINES FOR CLEANING MACHINE TOOLS, KNIFE SHARPENING MACHINES, KNIFE PLANING MACHINES, SCREWCUTTING MACHINES, MILLING AND BORING MACHINES, DEGREASING MACHINES FOR USE ON METAL AND TOOLS, AND MACHINE TOOL HOLDERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 008 | CUTTING HAND TOOLS, NAMELY, BORDERS, SCISSORS, KNIVES, HAND POWERED MILLING CUTTERS, DIES, HOLDERS FOR HAND DRILLS, TOOL HOLDERS, BITS FOR HAND DRILLS, PLANES, MOULDING IRONS, DIGGERS, PICKAXES, CHISELS, AXES AND PINCERS; HAND OPERATED GRINDING TOOLS AND INSTRUMENTS, NAMELY, MANUALLY-OPERATED GRINDING WHEELS; MANUALLY OPERATED GRINDING STONES; BLADES FOR HAND TOOLS; HAND TOOLS, NAMELY, TORQUE SPANNERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | TREATMENT OF MATERIALS, NAMELY, GRINDING SERVICES; METAL TREATMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, TREATMENT AND POLISHING OF METAL | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | ADVISORY SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT AND QUALITY IMPROVEMENT OF SOFTWARE; CONDUCTING OF FEASIBILITY STUDIES; CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF OFFICE AND WORKPLACE AUTOMATION; CREATION OF CONTROL PROGRAMS FOR AUTOMATED MEASUREMENT, ASSEMBLY, ADJUSTMENT, AND RELATED VISUALIZATION; CREATION OF CONTROL PROGRAMS FOR ELECTRIC OPERATION CONTROL AND DRIVE MODULES; DATA AUTOMATION AND COLLECTION SERVICES USING PROPRIETARY SOFTWARE TO EVALUATE, ANALYZE AND COLLECT SERVICE DATA; DATA MINING; ENGINEERING; MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; MECHANICAL RESEARCH; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT FOR OTHERS; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT CONSULTATION; PRODUCT RESEARCH; PRODUCT RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT; RESEARCH RELATING TO MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; SURVEYING AND ENGINEERING; TECHNICAL ADVICE ABOUT STEEL; TECHNICAL SURVEYING; TECHNOLOGY CONSULTATION AND RESEARCH IN THE FIELD OF WOOD AND METAL WORKING; TESTING AND RESEARCH ON MACHINES, APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS; TOOL DESIGN | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Kyocera Unimerco Tooling A/S
- Other trademarks owned by Unimerco A/S
- Other trademarks owned by Unimerco A/S
- Other trademarks owned by Unimerco Group A/S
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named UM DANDIA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 6, 2026 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2025 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2024 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Dec 15, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2016 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2016 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 20, 2016 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2014 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jun 15, 2012 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2012 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 13, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 27, 2012 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2012 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2012 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| May 21, 2009 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 7, 2008 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 4, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 8, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 8, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 16, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 26, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 11, 2006 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 11, 2006 | AMPB | AMENDMENT/PETITION AFTER APPROVAL FOR PUB ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 8, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 9, 2006 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 6, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2005 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2005 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2005 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 22, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 30, 2005 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 9, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 18, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |