USPTO serial 79002673
UM SOP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3223164Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 27, 2007
- Examiner
- SINGH, TEJBIR
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with UM SOP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | GRINDING MACHINES FOR WOOD AND METAL WORKING, POWER SAW BLADES, MACHINES FOR CLEANING MACHINE TOOLS, KNIFE SHARPENING MACHINES, KNIFE PLANING MACHINES, SCREW-CUTTING MACHINES, MACHINE TOOLS FOR WOOD AND METAL WORKING, NAMELY, MILL TOOLS AND BORING TOOLS, NAMELY, DRILL HOLDERS, DRILLS AND BITS; DEGREASING TOOLS FOR DEGREASING OF METAL, CUTTING TOOLS, NAMELY, MILL CUTTERS; KNIFE BLADES FOR USE AS A COMPONENT OF CUTTING MACHINERY; PLANE MOULDING IRONS | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 008 | CUTTING HAND TOOLS, NAMELY, SCISSORS, PICK AXES, CHISELS, AXES, PINCERS AND BLADES FOR HAND TOOLS | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | PLUMBING AND TOOL REPAIR SERVICES | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 040 | CONSULTING IN THE FIELD OF TREATMENT OF METAL AND METAL TREATING | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | ADVISORY SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT AND QUALITY IMPROVEMENT OF SOFTWARE; CONDUCTING OF FEASIBILITY STUDIES; CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF OFFICE AND WORKPLACE AUTOMATION; CREATION OF CONTROL PROGRAMS FOR AUTOMATED MEASUREMENT, ASSEMBLY, ADJUSTMENT, AND RELATED VISUALIZATION; CREATION OF CONTROL PROGRAMS FOR ELECTRIC OPERATION CONTROL AND DRIVE MODULES; DATE AUTOMATION AND COLLECTION SERVICE USING PROPRIETARY SOFTWARE TO EVALUATE, ANALYZE AND COLLECT SERVICE DATE; DATE MINING; ENGINEERING; MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; MECHANICAL RESEARCH; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT FOR OTHERS; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT CONSULTATION; PRODUCT RESEARCH; PRODUCT RESEARCH and DEVELOPMENT; RESEARCH RELATING TO MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; SURVEYING AND ENGINEERING; TECHNICAL ADVICE ABOUT STEEL; TECHNICAL SURVEYING; TECHNOLOGY CONSULTATION AND RESEARCH IN THE FIELD OF WOOD AND METAL WORKING; TECHNOLOGY CONSULTATION IN THE FIELD OF WOOD AND METAL WORKING; TESTING OR RESEARCH ON MACHINES, APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS; TOOL DESIGN | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Kyocera Unimerco Tooling A/S
- Other trademarks owned by Unimerco A/S
- Other trademarks owned by Unimerco A/S
- Other trademarks owned by Unimerco Group A/S
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named UM SOP
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 2014 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 2014 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2014 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 1, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 1, 2013 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Mar 22, 2012 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| May 21, 2009 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 7, 2008 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 9, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 20, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 1, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 11, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 6, 2006 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 6, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 9, 2005 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2005 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2005 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2005 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2005 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 9, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 31, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 31, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 13, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 2, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 18, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |