Drawing for FERM

USPTO serial 79002676

FERM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SWAIN, MICHELE LYNN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FERM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machines not included in other classes and machine tools; motors and engines (except for land vehicles); transmission couplings and belts (excluding those for land vehicles); large agricultural implements; incubatorsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
008Hand tools and instruments; cutlery; edged weaponsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 30, 2012DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jul 27, 2006FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 19, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jun 19, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 16, 2006ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Dec 13, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 13, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 9, 2005OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 17, 2005OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Nov 17, 2005OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Sep 12, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 13, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 13, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 26, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Apr 11, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 11, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 12, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 6, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 18, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Jun 17, 2004SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance