Drawing for IPRISK

USPTO serial 79002734

IPRISK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3032431Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 20, 2005
Examiner
CHOINIERE, MONIQUE
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IPRISK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Leo M. Loughlin

Leo M. Loughlin ROTHWELL FIGG ERNST & MANBECK PC901 New York Avenue, NWSuite 900 EastWASHINGTON, DC 20001

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER PROGRAMS AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF RISKS IN EXPLORATION, APPRAISAL, FIELD DEVELOPMENT, OPERATION AND PRODUCTION IN THE UPSTREAM PETROLEUM INDUSTRY; COMPUTER PROGRAMS AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR WELL PROJECT RISK ANALYSIS OF SINGLE WELLS AND DRILLING CAMPAIGNS; COMPUTER PROGRAMS AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR FIELD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT RISK ANALYSES OF POOLS OF PROSPECTS, DISCOVERIES AND PRODUCING FIELDS; COMPUTER PROGRAMS AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR ASSET EVALUATION SPECIFICALLY DESIGNED FOR DATA ROOM REVIEWS; PRERECORDED MAGNETIC DATA CARRIERS FEATURING COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR RISK MANAGEMENT IN THE UPSTREAM PETROLEUM INDUSTRYSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
042SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH AND INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH IN THE FIELD OF UPSTREAM PETROLEUM INDUSTRY; PROFESSIONAL CONSULTATIONS CONCERNING GEOLOGY AND GEOPHYSICS; TECHNICAL CONSULTATIONS CONCERNING RESERVOIR TECHNIQUES AND TECHNIQUES FOR THE PRODUCTION OF OIL AND GAS; TECHNICAL PROJECT STUDIES CONCERNING OIL AND GAS SEARCHING, AND OIL AND GAS PRODUCTION; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING FOR OTHERS; COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, DEVELOPMENT, DESIGN, UPDATING AND MAINTENANCE OF DATABASES; DEVELOPMENT, ENGINEERING SERVICESSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 17, 2024DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Aug 17, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 6, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 3, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 19, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 19, 2022ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS—
Oct 19, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 19, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 22, 2016NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jan 22, 201671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jan 22, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 18, 2015ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Nov 18, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 18, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 6, 2014RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Apr 13, 2012ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Nov 22, 2011NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED—
Nov 22, 2011NA15SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - MAILED—
Nov 22, 201171AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Nov 22, 201115AKREGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED—
Nov 2, 2011APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 1, 2011APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 19, 2011E15RTEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED—
Oct 19, 2011ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Sep 28, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 11, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 11, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 3, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 20, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 19, 2005OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 24, 2005OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 24, 2005OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 27, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 7, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 9, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 20, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 18, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 18, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 10, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 10, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 19, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 19, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 19, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 4, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 4, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 7, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 8, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 8, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 25, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 24, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance