Drawing for SYNNØVE

USPTO serial 79002844

SYNNØVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3046279Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 17, 2006
Examiner
WELLS, KELLEY L
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SYNNØVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LAWRENCE E. ABELMAN

LAWRENCE E. ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 THIRD AVENUENEW YORK, NY 10017-5621UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029[ Dairy products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; ] cheeses [, brown whey cheese; yoghurt, meat; fish ]SECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
032[ Fruit drinks and fruit juices ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 6, 2014DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jun 6, 2014DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 21, 2014INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Oct 24, 2013INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Dec 11, 2012INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Apr 11, 2012NA15SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - MAILED—
Apr 11, 2012NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED—
Apr 11, 201215AKREGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED—
Apr 11, 201271.PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED—
Apr 11, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 22, 201115AFREGISTERED - SEC. 15 AFFIDAVIT FILED—
Nov 22, 201171AFREGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED—
Nov 22, 2011ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Sep 28, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 6, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 6, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 5, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 17, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 19, 2005OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 24, 2005OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 24, 2005OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 25, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 5, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 13, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 8, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 6, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 30, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 15, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 15, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 15, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 10, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 16, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 11, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 11, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 25, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 24, 2004SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance