Drawing for PIPER-HEIDSIECK CHAMPAGNE BLANC DE BLANCS BRUT

USPTO serial 79002863

PIPER-HEIDSIECK CHAMPAGNE BLANC DE BLANCS BRUT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3029298Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 13, 2005
Examiner
KING, CHRISTINA B
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PIPER-HEIDSIECK CHAMPAGNE BLANC DE BLANCS BRUT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOHN A. CLIFFORD

JOHN A CLIFFORD MERCHANT & GOULD PCPO BOX 2910MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Wines with Champagne protected label of originSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 17, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Nov 14, 2014DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Nov 14, 2014DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 15, 2014INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 30, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Apr 24, 2014ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Aug 30, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jul 9, 2009ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Aug 24, 2006FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 24, 2006FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 31, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 31, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jul 28, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 23, 2005OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 13, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 1, 2005OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 1, 2005OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 20, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 31, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 11, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 29, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 26, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 26, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 26, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 12, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 11, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 28, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 25, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 25, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 10, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 21, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 19, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 27, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 2, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 1, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance