USPTO serial 79002874
PORTENTO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JACKSON, STEVEN W
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PORTENTO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Alcoholic beverages (except for beer) | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2024 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Sep 8, 2017 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 2, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 24, 2014 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2014 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 18, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 23, 2005 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 15, 2005 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| May 6, 2005 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2004 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 3, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 2, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |