USPTO serial 79002949
BW BONEWELDING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RADEMACHER, MARK A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BW BONEWELDING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electrically driven ultrasonic apparatus, namely electrically driven ultrasonic apparatus for joining together ceramics, synthetics and organic tissue using a synthetic material which is melted by mechanical vibrations, namely hand-held power tools comprising ultrasonic generators, converters and transducers, ultrasonic transducers, converters and generators, included in this class | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 010 | Surgical apparatus and instruments, namely forceps, pliers, cutters, drills, guides, distractors, retractors, cutting blades, saw blades and sets of these apparatus and instruments for bone surgery and plastic surgery, instruments for fixing synthetic implants to organic tissue, namely hand-held power tools for medical purposes comprising ultrasonic generators, converters and transducers, ultrasonic transducers, converters and generators; artificial limbs and implants, included in this class | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 2014 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2014 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 27, 2012 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| May 11, 2006 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 26, 2006 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 1, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 1, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 9, 2004 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 3, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 2, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |