Drawing for CITE DU DESIGN

USPTO serial 79002956

CITE DU DESIGN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
TAYLOR, DAVID T
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CITE DU DESIGN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035AdvertisingSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
038Computer-aided message and image transmission; teleconferencing servicesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
041Arranging and conducting of training workshops, arranging and conducting of conventions, arranging and conducting of conferences, arranging and conducting of seminars, organization of exhibitions for cultural or educational purposes, photography, publication of booksSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
042Architecture; design of interior decor; computer software designSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 16, 2014DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Aug 15, 2014DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
May 21, 2014LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED
Apr 3, 2014LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB
Apr 3, 2014ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
May 11, 2006FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 18, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Apr 17, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Apr 13, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 12, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 7, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 10, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 16, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 2, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Jul 1, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance