USPTO serial 79002974
Serial No. 79002974
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3055551Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 31, 2006
- Examiner
- HAYASH, SUSAN C
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 79002974?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Minato; Tokyo 107-8556, JP
Minato; Tokyo 107-8556, JP
Minato; Tokyo 107-8556, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SARAH BRUNO
Sarah L. Bruno and Charles M. Marmelstein ARENT FOX LLP1717 K Street, NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036-5342UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | [ Paper and cardboard, namely, printing paper, India paper, carbon paper, glassine paper, typewriting paper, linerboard for corrugated cardboard, millboard, postcard paper, Japanese handicraft paper, napkin paper, duplicating paper, luminous paper, corrugated cardboard, and synthetic paper for printing, industrial packaging containers of paper, food wrapping plastic film for household use, garbage bags of paper, garbage bags of plastics, hygiene paper, namely, wet wipe for hygienic purposes, wet tissue paper, towels of paper, table cloths of paper, table napkins of paper, hand towels of paper, * banner of paper *, flags of paper, handkerchiefs of paper, blinds of paper, babies' diapers of paper, tailor's chalk, tags for identification purposes, ] printed matter, namely, [ picture postcards, catalogues, calendars, magazines (publication), books, newspapers, [newsletters, pamphlets] * newsletters and pamphlets in the field of the automotive industry, the machine industry, and vehicles, * paintings and calligraphic works, photographs, photograph stands in the nature of picture frames, easel-like stands, desktop stands, stickers, ] miscellaneous stationary [, pastes and other adhesives for stationery or household purposes, addressing machines, printers' reglets (interline leads), inking ribbons, printing types, hectograph machines, automatic stamp putting-on machines, electric staplers for offices, envelop sealing machines for offices, stamp obliterating machines, drawing instruments, decorators' paintbrushes, typewriters, check writers, mimeographs, relief duplicators, paper shredder, sealing wax, marking templates, franking machines (stamping machines), rotary duplicators, indoor aquaria ] | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 027 | [ Automobile carpets, ] floor coverings, namely, [ carpets, rugs, ] mats [, artificial turf, tapestry (wall hangings) not of textile ] | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 4, 2014 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 4, 2014 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 7, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2012 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2012 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 23, 2012 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2012 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2010 | INAR | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 2009 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2009 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2007 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 9, 2006 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 7, 2006 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 31, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 31, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 9, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 19, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 16, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 7, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 1, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 1, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 31, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 15, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 14, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 3, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 16, 2004 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 2, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |