Drawing for X-TAS-Y

USPTO serial 79002997

X-TAS-Y

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3041889Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 10, 2006
Examiner
GARTNER, JOHN M
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with X-TAS-Y?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert W. Becker

ROBERT W BECKER ROBERT W BECKER & ASSOCIATES707 HWY 66 E STE BTIJERAS, NM 87059UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Bicycles; bicycle parts, namely, frames, forks, suspension forks, wheel, axis and fork bearings, gears, brakes, cranks, pedal housings, steering bearing kits for bicycles, pedals, wheel hubs, quick release skewers and levers, wheel rims, tires, handle bar stems, handlebars, handlebar extensions, seat pillars, mudguards, lights, spokes, and frames for luggage carriers for bicyclesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 8, 2016UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Jun 23, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jun 23, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 20, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jul 15, 2014INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 30, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Aug 30, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Aug 5, 2010NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 28, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 18, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 18, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 10, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 10, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 3, 2006RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Dec 22, 2005OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 1, 2005OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 1, 2005OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 18, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 28, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 15, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 5, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 5, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 4, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 4, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 4, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 4, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 29, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 22, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 22, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Oct 14, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 21, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 8, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 2, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 1, 2004SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance