USPTO serial 79003076
MEDINVENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3145652Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 19, 2006
- Examiner
- HAN, DAWN L
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MEDINVENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
DE
DE
DE
DE
DE
DE
DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ralph E. Locher
Ralph E. Locher Lerner and Greenberg P.A.PO Box 2480Hollywood, FL 33022-2480UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Data processing devices, namely, computer monitors and personal computers, except in connection with electric and electronic regulating and checking apparatus and instruments for regulating gases, flow meters, and remote control devices | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 010 | Electronic diagnosis and medical therapy apparatus and devices in the field of medical technology, namely, radiological machines for medical purposes; machines for recording, processing, storage and reproduction of radiological information; bone setting machines and instruments; electric bone operating machines; computer tomography machines; magnetic resonance ct machines; ultrasound medical diagnostic machines; nuclear medicine diagnostic imaging machines; positron-emission tomography (PET) machines; digital recording machines for contrast-medium examinations in real-time imaging; endourological radiology machines; urological imaging machines; measuring machines for medical functional analyses; cardiac catheterization machines; patient monitoring and arrhythmia analysis machines; heart pacemakers; defibrillators; respiration monitors; respirators for artificial respiration; catheters; linear accelerators for tumor radiotherapy; telemetry devices for medical applications; dosage planning and documentation machines for tumor radiotherapy; hearing aids; and medical sensor for monitoring the taking of medication | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Legal consultation; industrial property consultation; legal services in the field of patents; and conducting of feasibility studies in the field of medical science and medical technology | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Theresa Hafner
- Other trademarks owned by Theresa Hafner
- Other trademarks owned by Dr. Dieter Hafner
- Other trademarks owned by Magdalena Hafner
- Other trademarks owned by Magdalena Hafner
- Other trademarks owned by Magdalena Hafner
- Other trademarks owned by Theresa Hafner
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named MEDINVENT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jul 31, 2014 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2014 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 15, 2014 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 30, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 6, 2013 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Aug 30, 2013 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Sep 15, 2009 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Sep 15, 2009 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 1, 2009 | C18P | CANCELLED SECTION 18-PARTIAL | — |
| Aug 19, 2009 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 4, 2009 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 2, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 19, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 27, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 7, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 5, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 5, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 1, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 20, 2006 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 6, 2006 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 8, 2005 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 8, 2005 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 13, 2005 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 14, 2005 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 31, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 31, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 18, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 18, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 18, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2004 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 4, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 9, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 8, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |