Drawing for DECOTHERM

USPTO serial 79003109

DECOTHERM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3035925Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 27, 2005
Examiner
LINCOSKI JR, JOHN T
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DECOTHERM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mary Margaret L. O'Donnell

Mary Margaret L. O'Donnell Rader, Fishman & Grauer PLLC39533 Woodward Avenue, Suite 140Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
017Insulation materials for roofing and wall claddingSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 27, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Dec 4, 2014DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Dec 4, 2014DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 16, 2014INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 30, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Aug 30, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Mar 18, 2011NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 3, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 3, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 2, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Sep 2, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 5, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 12, 2006CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Aug 16, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 16, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 3, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 16, 2006NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 31, 2005OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 27, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 8, 2005OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 8, 2005OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 4, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 14, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 23, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 17, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 8, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 7, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 23, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 23, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 18, 2005IRRFIRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB—
Dec 14, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 8, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 7, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 9, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 8, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance