Drawing for GLIDE'N LOCK

USPTO serial 79003150

GLIDE'N LOCK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3129970Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 15, 2006
Examiner
YOUNG, CARRIE SKYE
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GLIDE'N LOCK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brett I. Miller, Esq. and the firm of Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, MICHAEL F. CLAYTON, JAMES R. SIMS III, RON N. DREBEN, KAREN A. BUTCHER, BRETT I. MILLER, ANITA B. POLOTT , CAROLE R. KLEIN, MEREDITH A. CARLO, JOSEPH E. WASHINGTON, ROBERT P. HENLEY, JAKE

BRETT I MILLER ESQ MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP1111 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWATTN TMSUWASHINGTON, DC 20004

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
017Rubber and gutta-percha for use in the manufacture of footwear; nonmetalic flexible pipes; shock absorbing buffers of rubber for use in the manufacture of footwear; rings of rubber for use in the manufacture of footwear; adhesive tapes other than for medical, stationary, or household purposes, namely for the fixation of sole elements of shoesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
025Footwear; heels; heelpieces for shoes; iron fittings for shoes; non-slip devices for footwear; shoes; shoe soles; sports footwear and shoes; sandals; laced boots; bootsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 12, 2014DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Dec 12, 2014DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Dec 5, 2014INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jul 17, 2014INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jul 16, 2014INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 30, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Aug 30, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Aug 20, 2009CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Apr 18, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 10, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 10, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 10, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 15, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 22, 2006ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Jun 5, 2006OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 25, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 5, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 2, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 24, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 17, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 6, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 1, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 1, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 31, 2005OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 8, 2005OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 8, 2005OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 4, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 4, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 14, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 20, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 13, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 13, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 4, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 4, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 3, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 21, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 16, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 16, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 9, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 8, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance