Drawing for DELBARD CRÉATEUR DE NATURE

USPTO serial 79003184

DELBARD CRÉATEUR DE NATURE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3148832Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 26, 2006
Examiner
LOTT, JASON E
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DELBARD CRÉATEUR DE NATURE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JULIE B. SEYLER

JULIE B SEYLER ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 3RD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemicals used in horticulture, namely soil amendments, soil additives, fertilizersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
016Flowerpot covers of paper, wrapping paper, small bags for packaging made of paper or plasticSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
031Horticultural and forestry products, namely raw onions, flower bulbs, live flowers, living plants, living trees, plant seedsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 3, 2021DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jan 3, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 6, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jul 16, 2014INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 30, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Aug 30, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Sep 2, 2010NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 2, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jan 14, 2010RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
May 2, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 1, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 1, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 26, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 26, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 4, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 14, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 17, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 15, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 20, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 19, 2006RGRRREINSTATEMENT GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Jan 30, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 5, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 5, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Dec 31, 2005OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 16, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 16, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 8, 2005OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 8, 2005OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 5, 2005CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jun 23, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 26, 2005DCPNCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
May 18, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 17, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 10, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 28, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 28, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 23, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 18, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 8, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 28, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 9, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 8, 2004SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance