Drawing for BLIZZARD

USPTO serial 79003227

BLIZZARD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FERRAIUOLO, DOMINIC
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BLIZZARD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Welding or cutting apparatus (not electrical), welding burners (all aforementioned goods as far as not included in other classes)SECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
009Charging apparatus for accumulators; arc or laser welding apparatus (not for medical purposes); electrical welding or cutting apparatus, particularly arc-welding apparatus; welding electrodes, current and voltage converters, particularly for welding apparatus; current sources, particularly inverter current sources, frequency converters, plasma welding current sources; transformers, photovoltaic systems, structural parts for automated welding; electrical displacement units for vehicles, control systems for handling apparatus or robots, microprocessor control systems for all of the aforementioned goods; computer software on data carriers, parts of all the aforementioned goods (as far as not included in other classes); none of the aforesaid goods being included in other classes and none being used in relation to games, entertainment or education, computer games, electronic games, interactive games, or software related to entertainmentSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
042Project or construction planning for the development of current sources and welding apparatus, apparatus and control systems, particularly in conjunction with electronic systems for current sources or welding apparatus; development of computer software, particularly for welding apparatus, for control systems, for quality assurance and for contract management; development of new welding processes or new additive materials for such processesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 31, 2014DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Oct 30, 2014DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 1, 2008CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 1, 2006FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 17, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 16, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 15, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 15, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 3, 2005RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 16, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 11, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 29, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 19, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 15, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance