Drawing for AIRFLUX

USPTO serial 79003297

AIRFLUX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3032441Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 20, 2005
Examiner
LEE, DOUGLAS
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AIRFLUX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOHN S EGBERT

JOHN S EGBERT EGBERT LAW OFFICES412 MAIN ST FL 7HOUSTON, TX 77002-1838UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Ironing boards, ironing board coversSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 7, 2014INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Nov 7, 2014UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Oct 10, 2014DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Oct 10, 2014DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 17, 2014INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 30, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Aug 30, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Aug 31, 2006FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 31, 2006FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 11, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 11, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 3, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 6, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 20, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 15, 2005OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 15, 2005OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 27, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 7, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 27, 2005DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Jun 14, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 10, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 10, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 10, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 10, 2005CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
May 20, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 19, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 5, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 26, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 4, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 4, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 4, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 6, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 1, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 19, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 15, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance