Drawing for ESC

USPTO serial 79003324

ESC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3015777Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 15, 2005
Examiner
RINGLE, JAMES W
Law office
MADRID PROCESSING UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ESC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Apolzon, Esq.

LAWRENCE E APOLZON ESQ FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012vehicles, namely bicycles, scooters, mopeds and motorcycles, and excluding automobiles, engines and structural parts thereof, with all of the foregoing linked to Applicant's luxury brandSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 6, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Nov 7, 2014DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Nov 7, 2014DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 17, 2014INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 30, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Aug 30, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Feb 17, 2013ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jul 21, 2010CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED—
Jul 16, 2010CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 3, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Nov 6, 2008ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Oct 30, 2008NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 5, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 19, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 19, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jul 12, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 3, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 3, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 2, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 15, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 23, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 3, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 2, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 29, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 26, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 22, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 14, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 14, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 30, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 9, 2004LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Nov 19, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 14, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 12, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 19, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 15, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance