Drawing for EXTRAIT KÜBLER

USPTO serial 79003346

EXTRAIT KÜBLER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3068366Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 14, 2006
Examiner
SHARPER JR, SAM
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EXTRAIT KÜBLER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LEIGH ANN LINDQUIST

INTELTECH SA CASE POSTALE 251010, RUE J-L-POURTALèS, CH-2001 NEUCHâTELSWITZERLAND

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Alcoholic beverages, namely, wine, liquors and distilled spirits; all of the aforesaid goods originating from VAL-DE-TRAVERSSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 18, 2013DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 2, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 18, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 18, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 10, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 14, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 19, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 6, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 20, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 15, 2005OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 15, 2005OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 30, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 28, 2005CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 28, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 28, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 24, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 13, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 1, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 31, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 25, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 9, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 9, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 21, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 8, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 7, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 24, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 27, 2005CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jan 14, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 6, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 29, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 19, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 15, 2004SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance